LK INNOVATE

By Dr Lokman Khan

Executive Summary

The Hindu population in Bangladesh constitutes approximately 8% of the total population as per the 2022 census, reflecting a profound decline from historical levels. This demographic shift is largely attributed to sustained pressures, including the enduring impact of discriminatory legislation and an environment of insecurity. While the government officially promotes equal rights, the representation of religious minorities, including Hindus, in the public sector appears to generally align with their proportion in the overall population (9-14%) according to recent academic research, refuting claims of overrepresentation. However, historical reports suggest underrepresentation at higher levels, and recent changes to the quota system raise concerns for future proportional representation. Specific data for Hindu representation in law enforcement and education is limited. Nevertheless, reports of police malpractice and impunity for communal violence indicate ongoing challenges within the justice system. In the broader labor force, Hindus show a slightly higher employment rate than Muslims, and some studies suggest a wage advantage for educated Hindu male workers in the private sector, linked to their improved educational qualifications and a reduction in discrimination during specific periods. Persistent challenges for the Hindu community include the enduring legacy of the Vested Property Act, which has led to widespread land dispossession, and sporadic communal violence often linked to political turmoil, with concerns regarding impunity for perpetrators. These factors contribute significantly to insecurity and emigration. The demographic decline and ongoing challenges underscore the critical need for robust implementation of protective policies, addressing systemic issues like land rights, and ensuring accountability to foster genuine equality and security for religious minorities in Bangladesh.

Introduction

Bangladesh, a nation predominantly characterized by its Muslim majority, constitutionally designates Islam as the state religion. Concurrently, its legal framework explicitly ensures equal status and rights for all other religions, specifically recognizing Hinduism, Buddhism, and Christianity. This report undertakes a detailed examination of the demographic status of the Hindu population in Bangladesh and analyzes their representation across various employment sectors. The scope of this analysis directly addresses the user’s inquiry by presenting current and historical data on the Hindu population percentage, evaluating their presence in government employment (including the vital law and order and education sectors), and exploring their participation within the private sector. Furthermore, the report delves into the key factors and policies that influence Hindu employment opportunities, as well as their broader security and well-being within the country. This comprehensive assessment is meticulously tailored for policy analysts, academic researchers, and non-governmental organization (NGO) representatives who require precise, fact-based, and analytical insights into the socio-economic conditions and human rights concerns affecting religious minorities in Bangladesh.

Hindu Population Demographics in Bangladesh

Current Percentage and Distribution

The most recent official data from the 2022 national government census indicates that Hindus constitute approximately 8% of Bangladesh’s total population. More precisely, the 2022 census reports that Hindus comprise 7.95% of the total population, numbering around 13.1 million individuals out of a total population of 165.16 million. It is important to acknowledge that another source from 2023 provides a slightly different estimate, placing Hindus at 9.38% of the population. This discrepancy highlights the dynamic nature of demographic reporting and the importance of relying on the most recent official census data where available.

Hinduism is recognized as the second largest religious affiliation in Bangladesh. The Hindu population is not uniformly distributed across the country but shows significant concentrations in specific regions. The Sylhet division, for instance, records the highest Hindu population percentage at 13.51%, followed by Rangpur at 13.01%, and Khulna at 11.53%. Conversely, the Mymensingh Division has the lowest percentage of people belonging to the Hindu community, recorded at 3.94% as of 2022.

Historical Trends and Decline

The percentage of the Hindu population in the territory that now constitutes Bangladesh has undergone a profound and consistent decline over the past century. Historical census data reveals a significant reduction from 33.0% in 1901 to 28% by 1941, prior to the Partition of British India. This trend continued with a further drop to 22% in 1951, 13.5% in 1974 following Bangladesh’s independence, and a sustained decrease to 8.0% by 2022.

The consistent and drastic decline in the Hindu population percentage, particularly the sharp drops observed immediately following the 1947 Partition of British India and the 1971 Independence from Pakistan, extends beyond typical demographic shifts. This sustained reduction points to an environment of persistent pressure, heightened insecurity, and systemic discrimination that has demonstrably led to significant emigration of the Hindu community. This demographic trend serves as a critical indicator of the enduring challenges faced by the Hindu community, including issues of land dispossession and communal violence, which have eroded their sense of security and belonging. The Vested Property Act, for instance, has been identified as a factor contributing to this reduction, with estimates suggesting a loss of around 11 million people due to its provisions. The act, which constructed Hindus as “Other” and a national security threat, legitimized property appropriation and created profound insecurity. This “state sanctioned communalism” led to extensive land-grabbing, turning Hindu litigants into “landless paupers”. Furthermore, political instability and social unrest have disproportionately affected minorities, leading to harassment, forced displacement, and violent attacks, which naturally contribute to a sense of insecurity and the decision to emigrate. The emergence of an increasingly restrictive religious nationalism since 1971 has further marginalized Bangladesh’s minorities within their own country, providing a broader socio-political context for the ongoing pressures.

Table 1: Hindu Population Percentage in Bangladesh (1901-2022)

Year	Islam (%)	Hinduism (%)	Buddhism (%)	Christianity (%)	Others (%)
1901	66.1	33.0	Added to others	Added to others	0.9
1911	67.2	31.5	Added to others	Added to others	1.3
1921	68.1	30.6	Added to others	Added to others	1.3
1931	69.5	29.4	Added to others	0.2	1.0
1941	70.3	28.0	Added to others	0.1	1.6
1951	76.9	22.0	0.7	0.3	0.1
1961	80.4	18.5	0.7	0.3	0.1
1974	85.4	13.5	0.6	0.2	0.2
1981	86.6	12.1	0.6	0.3	0.3
1991	88.3	10.5	0.6	0.3	0.3
2001	89.7	9.2	0.7	0.3	0.1
2011	90.4	8.5	0.6	0.3	0.1
2022	91.0	8.0	0.6	0.3	0.1
Source:

Hindu Representation in Government Employment

Overall Public Sector Employment

Historically, reports have indicated that religious minorities were “underrepresented in government jobs, especially at the higher levels of the civil and foreign services”. This perception of disadvantage in accessing government or military jobs and political office was reiterated in a 2022 report.

However, a more recent and comprehensive academic study from 2023 provides a contrasting perspective. This study, which investigated approximately 119,436 public sector employees across various levels, including ministries, universities, districts, and sub-districts, found that the “percentage of religious minorities mirrors their proportion in the overall population (which is 9 percent),” with their participation ranging between 9-14% at all levels. Crucially, this study explicitly identifies claims by some Islamic religious leaders and politicians of 25-35% minority overrepresentation as unsubstantiated.

The direct contradiction between older reports of underrepresentation and a recent, large-scale empirical study showing proportional representation in the public sector is a critical finding. This suggests a complex and potentially evolving reality. While historical disadvantages and lingering perceptions may persist, the 2023 study indicates a more equitable distribution in terms of overall public sector numbers. The explicit identification of unsubstantiated claims regarding overrepresentation is paramount, as such false assertions have been documented as a major tool used to fuel communal tensions and justify persecution against minorities. This highlights the necessity of relying on robust, recent empirical data to counter politically motivated narratives and understand the true state of affairs.

Table 2: Religious Composition of Bangladesh Civil Service (Historical Trends)

Year	Muslim (%)	Hindu (%)
1990	77.55	22.45
2001	96.60	3.4
2012	Increased	Increased
2017	Increased	Increased
Source:

Table 3: Religious Minority Representation in Public Sector Employment (Recent Study)

Religious Group	Percentage in Public Sector Employment	Percentage in Overall Population (2022 Census)
Religious Minorities	9-14% (at all levels)	~8% (Hindus), <9% (all minorities)
Muslims	Not explicitly stated, but majority	~91%
Source:

Specific Sectors

Law and Order (Police, Judiciary)

Specific percentage data for Hindu representation within the Bangladesh Police Force or the broader law and order sector is not explicitly available in the provided information. However, the Bangladesh Police Force (BPF) plays a significant role in responding to incidents involving religious minorities. For instance, the BPF examined 1,769 attacks and acts of vandalism against religious minorities between August 4 and 20, 2024, classifying 1,234 as politically motivated and only 20 as communal in nature. The Police Headquarters has also publicly dismissed allegations that recent attacks on religious minorities were primarily driven by communal hatred, instead attributing them to personal, financial, or familial disputes.

The BPF’s consistent classification of incidents as non-communal, despite reports from human rights groups citing higher figures and a communal dimension , raises serious questions about the impartiality and effectiveness of law enforcement in protecting minorities. This stance, coupled with broader claims of “complicity of law enforcement agencies and the judiciary” in abuses against minorities and “police malpractice” , suggests a systemic issue where state mechanisms designed to ensure justice and protection may be compromised or ineffective. The lack of transparent data on Hindu representation within the police force further hinders an assessment of whether the force adequately reflects the diversity of the population it serves, which could impact trust and the perceived legitimacy of their responses to minority concerns. This situation, where institutions meant to provide protection are perceived as biased or ineffective, directly contributes to the insecurity experienced by Hindus. It erodes trust, discourages the reporting of crimes, and perpetuates a cycle of vulnerability, impacting all aspects of minority life, including their economic participation and sense of belonging.

Education Sector

No specific percentage for Hindu teachers in Bangladesh’s education sector is explicitly provided in the research material. However, the broader context of the education system indicates a notable trend: an increasing preference for religious education (madrasas) among students. The percentage of students opting for religious education rose from 4.98% in 2021 to 7.29% in 2023, while general education saw a corresponding decline from 91.93% to 91.02%.

The growing preference for religious education, which is predominantly Islamic in Bangladesh, signifies a shifting educational landscape that could have long-term implications for the overall secular nature of the education system and, by extension, for employment within the education sector. While not directly providing data on Hindu teachers, this trend suggests a potential for reduced diversity in the teaching profession over time. This shift could indirectly impact the curriculum’s inclusivity or the representation of minority perspectives within educational institutions. It may also influence the career pathways and choices available to Hindu youth, potentially leading to a self-reinforcing cycle of underrepresentation if the sector becomes less welcoming or viable for non-Muslims. This societal shift, while not directly showing discrimination against Hindu teachers, points to a subtle marginalization of minority participation in a key public sector, affecting both employment opportunities and cultural representation.

Government Policies and Quota System

Bangladesh is constitutionally defined as a secular pluralist parliamentary democracy, with its constitution declaring Islam as the state religion but simultaneously ensuring equal status and rights for all religions, specifically mentioning Hinduism, Buddhism, and Christianity. The government has publicly committed to supporting religious diversity and has implemented policies aimed at protecting minority rights. Furthermore, the government has explicitly denied claims of banning Hindus from government jobs.

The Bangladesh Civil Service (BCS) has historically utilized a quota system to ensure representation for specific demographic groups, which included “ethnic and religious minorities”. Historical data for civil service officers shows that in 1990, Hindus comprised 22.45% of officers. This figure drastically reduced to 3.4% in 2001, but subsequently “again increased” in 2012 and 2017 , though specific percentages for the latter years are not provided.

A significant and very recent development occurred on July 21, 2024, when the Supreme Court of Bangladesh issued a decision that substantially altered the quota system. It increased merit-based recruitment to 93% of available positions and reduced the quota for ethnic minorities to 1%. This ruling also removed previous specific quotas for women and underrepresented districts. It is worth noting that a 2023 State.gov report mentioned government initiatives that included “reinstating the government employment quota system for members of religious minority communities”. This appears to be in contradiction with the Supreme Court’s very recent ruling in July 2024 which reduced the ethnic minority quota.

Despite constitutional guarantees of equality and stated government commitments to diversity, the historical sharp decline in Hindu representation in the civil service (1990-2001) and the very recent, drastic reduction of the ethnic minority quota to 1% highlight a significant gap between policy ideals and practical outcomes or evolving priorities. The 1% quota for ethnic minorities, when Hindus constitute approximately 8% of the total population , raises serious concerns about future proportional representation in government jobs. This policy shift could potentially undermine the “mirroring” representation observed in the 2023 study and lead to a renewed decline in Hindu representation, especially at entry levels, despite the government’s stated commitment to minority rights. This also suggests a potential disconnect or power dynamic between different branches of government or policy objectives. This situation could exacerbate the “disadvantaged in practice” observation from older reports and further undermine the sense of inclusion and security for the Hindu community, potentially contributing to continued emigration or disengagement from public life.

Hindu Representation in the Private Sector

Analysis of Available Data

Comprehensive, specific statistics on Hindu employment percentages solely within the private sector are not explicitly detailed across the provided information. This indicates a data gap that limits a precise assessment of Hindu representation in this specific sector.

However, data from a labor force survey provides insights into overall employment status by religion. This survey indicates that within the broader labor force, Hindus exhibit a slightly higher employment rate (55.1%) compared to Muslims (54.3%). Buddhists and Christians show even higher employment rates at 68.9% and 70.1% respectively. This suggests that, in terms of overall employment, Hindus are not necessarily at a disadvantage compared to the majority population.

Furthermore, a study examining the wage gap between Muslims and Hindus over the period 1999-2009 revealed a “significant wage advantage for Hindu male workers aged 15-65 across the wage distribution”. The primary drivers identified for this advantage were an “improvement in their educational qualifications” and a finding that “the extent of discrimination against Hindu wage workers disappeared completely over the period 1999-2009”.

The findings of a wage advantage for Hindu male workers and a slightly higher overall employment rate for Hindus (compared to Muslims) challenge a simplistic narrative of universal and pervasive economic disadvantage for Hindus across all sectors. This suggests a more nuanced economic reality: despite facing significant systemic challenges such as land dispossession through the Vested Property Act and communal violence, certain segments of the Hindu community, particularly those who invest in and achieve higher educational qualifications, have been able to secure competitive positions and even advantages in the labor market, especially within the private sector. This can be interpreted as a form of community resilience, where education is strategically pursued as a means of achieving economic security in an otherwise vulnerable environment. The emphasis on “improved educational qualifications” suggests a strategic investment in human capital by the Hindu community, potentially as a response to the insecurity and land dispossession, where education becomes a more portable and secure asset than land. The “disappearance of discrimination” in the 1999-2009 period also points to dynamic labor market conditions that might have favored certain skills or sectors where Hindus were well-represented, indicating that while external pressures exist, internal community strategies and market dynamics play a role in economic outcomes.

Challenges and Broader Economic Context

The private sector is widely recognized as “crucial for job growth” in Bangladesh. However, the country is currently grappling with a significant youth unemployment crisis, and private investment has experienced a recent decline, dropping from 24% to 22.5%. While these economic challenges are not specific to Hindus, they represent a broader adverse economic climate that affects all segments of the workforce, including religious minorities. Issues such as garment factory closures, for instance, contribute to job losses across the board.

It is important to acknowledge a highly biased source that alleges 2.6 million Indians hold highly paid jobs in Bangladesh’s private sector, contributing to local unemployment and implying “Indian aggression”. This claim is presented with a strong nationalistic and inflammatory tone and should be viewed with extreme caution, as its reliability is questionable without corroborating, neutral sources.

Challenges and Factors Affecting Hindu Employment

Historical Legislation: The Vested Property Act (VPA)

The Vested Property Act (VPA), which originated as the Enemy Property Act in 1965, has been consistently identified as the “longest running and most damaging” threat faced by non-Muslims in Bangladesh. This controversial law empowered the government to confiscate property from individuals deemed “enemies of the state,” a provision that disproportionately affected Hindus who migrated to India.

The act has resulted in the confiscation of an estimated 1.64 million acres of land, which is equivalent to a staggering 53% of the total land owned by the Hindu community, leading to the dispossession of approximately 748,850 families. The implementation of this act often involved the “complicity of corrupt, local officials” , highlighting systemic issues in its application. Despite the enactment of the Vested Property Return Act in 2001, intended to rectify these injustices, there has been “little progress” in returning or compensating lost property to the affected families.

The Vested Property Act is not merely a historical legal relic; its ongoing legacy represents a profound and systemic mechanism of state-sanctioned economic dispossession that has severely impacted the Hindu community’s generational wealth, land ownership, and overall economic stability. This forced economic marginalization directly contributes to their pervasive sense of insecurity, often compelling emigration, and fundamentally limits their ability to invest in businesses, access credit, or secure employment opportunities that rely on capital or property. It serves as a stark illustration of deep-seated structural discrimination that actively undermines constitutional guarantees of equality. The act’s impact extends far beyond immediate land loss; it has fundamentally eroded the economic base of the Hindu community, creating “landless paupers”. The failure to make progress on returning confiscated property further exacerbates the situation, demonstrating a persistent challenge in addressing historical injustices.

Societal Discrimination and Communal Violence

Religious minorities in Bangladesh, including Hindus, are generally able to practice their faiths freely and without harassment from non-state actors. Inter-religious relations and coexistence are often positive and peaceful, with many religious festivals jointly celebrated by people of different faiths. However, instances of sporadic communal violence persist, often linked to periods of political upheaval. Such violence has resulted in deaths, injuries, assaults, and damage to property, particularly targeting Hindu homes, businesses, and places of worship during periods of political turmoil, such as the downfall of the Awami League government in July and August 2024.

There are varying figures on the extent of violence against religious minorities. For example, the Bangladesh Hindu Buddha Christian Unity Council reported 2,184 incidents of violence between August 4 and December 31, 2024, while the Bangladesh Police Force (BPF) examined 1,769 attacks during a similar period, classifying most as politically motivated rather than communal. Despite police assertions that most incidents stem from personal or financial disputes rather than communal hatred , human rights organizations continue to highlight the vulnerability of minorities to targeted attacks and communal violence, often with perpetrators enjoying apparent impunity.

The persistence of sporadic communal violence and the varying interpretations of its nature (communal vs. politically motivated or personal) by authorities and human rights groups underscore a deep-seated vulnerability for religious minorities. Even if incidents are politically motivated, the fact that minorities disproportionately bear the brunt of societal anger during upheaval points to their precarious position as the “lowest rung on the social ladder”. This environment of insecurity, coupled with allegations of complicity by law enforcement and the judiciary in abuses , creates a climate of fear that impacts all aspects of life for Hindus, including their educational pursuits, career choices, and overall economic participation. The lack of accountability for perpetrators further exacerbates this insecurity, as it signals that justice may not be reliably obtained, thereby perpetuating a cycle of vulnerability and potentially contributing to emigration.

Government Initiatives and Responses

The government of Bangladesh has publicly declared its commitment to supporting religious diversity and has implemented policies to protect minority rights. The constitution prohibits the abuse of religion for political purposes and discrimination or persecution based on religion. The state takes reasonable steps to prevent persecution, including deploying law enforcement personnel at religious sites and events considered potential targets for violence, and arresting and charging those involved in violence against religious minorities. In December 2024, the interim leader of the government, Muhammad Yunus, met with leaders from religious minorities to address their concerns and reiterate the importance of equality.

Despite these stated commitments and protective measures, the ongoing challenges faced by religious minorities, particularly Hindus, suggest a persistent gap between policy intent and effective implementation. While the government denies claims of banning Hindus from government jobs , the recent reduction of the ethnic minority quota in civil service to 1% directly contradicts earlier reports of initiatives to reinstate quotas for religious minorities. This policy inconsistency or shift, particularly the drastic reduction of affirmative action measures, indicates that while the government may express a commitment to diversity, the mechanisms for ensuring equitable representation and addressing historical disadvantages may be weakening. The continued reports of violence and land grabbing, despite police efforts, also highlight that protective measures are not always sufficient or effectively enforced, leading to ongoing insecurity and vulnerability for the Hindu community.

Conclusion

The Hindu population in Bangladesh, currently accounting for approximately 8% of the total population as per the 2022 census, has experienced a significant and consistent decline over the past century. This demographic shift is not merely a natural phenomenon but a profound indicator of historical and ongoing pressures, including the devastating impact of the Vested Property Act and recurring communal violence. These factors have systematically eroded the Hindu community’s economic base, sense of security, and belonging, contributing to substantial emigration.

In terms of employment, recent academic research suggests that the overall representation of religious minorities in the public sector (9-14%) generally aligns with their proportion in the total population, countering claims of overrepresentation. However, historical accounts point to underrepresentation, particularly at higher levels, and the very recent reduction of the ethnic minority quota in the civil service to 1% raises serious concerns about the future of proportional representation for Hindus in government employment. While specific data for Hindu representation in law enforcement and education is limited, the responses of law enforcement to communal violence, often downplaying its communal nature, indicate a potential institutional bias or an effectiveness gap that exacerbates the insecurity faced by minorities. In the private sector, available data suggests Hindus exhibit a slightly higher overall employment rate than Muslims, and some studies indicate a wage advantage for educated Hindu male workers, possibly reflecting strategic investment in education as a means of economic resilience despite broader systemic challenges.

Overall, the status of the Hindu population and their employment in Bangladesh presents a complex and evolving picture. While constitutional provisions and government statements affirm equality and protection for religious minorities, the enduring legacy of discriminatory laws, coupled with sporadic communal violence and recent policy shifts in affirmative action, continue to pose significant challenges. Addressing these deep-rooted issues, ensuring accountability for perpetrators of violence, and consistently implementing policies that genuinely promote equitable opportunities and security are critical for fostering a truly inclusive society in Bangladesh.

Works cited

1. Country policy and information note: religious minorities and atheists, Bangladesh, June 2025 – GOV.UK, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bangladesh-country-policy-and-information-notes/country-policy-and-information-note-religious-minorities-and-atheists-bangladesh-june-2025 

2. 2023 Report on International Religious Freedom: Bangladesh – U.S. Department of State, https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-report-on-international-religious-freedom/bangladesh/ 

3. Religion in Bangladesh – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Bangladesh 

4. Hinduism in Bangladesh – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hinduism_in_Bangladesh 

5. Bangladesh Report 2023 – ACN International, https://www.acninternational.org/religiousfreedomreport/reports/country/2023/bangladesh 

6. 2022 Report on International Religious Freedom: Bangladesh – U.S. Department of State, https://www.state.gov/reports/2022-report-on-international-religious-freedom/bangladesh 

7. Vested Property Act (Bangladesh) – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vested_Property_Act_(Bangladesh) 

8. The Hindu as Other: State, Law, and Land Relations in Contemporary Bangladesh, https://journals.openedition.org/samaj/4111 

9. Rights of Religious Minorities | Ain o Salish Kendra(ASK), https://www.askbd.org/ask/rights-religious-minorities/ 

10. Religious minorities suffer in overflow of Bangladesh social unrest – Mission Network News, https://www.mnnonline.org/news/religious-minorities-suffer-in-overflow-of-bangladesh-social-unrest/ 

11. Under threat: the challenges facing religious minorities in Bangladesh – ReliefWeb, https://reliefweb.int/report/bangladesh/under-threat-challenges-facing-religious-minorities-bangladesh 

12. 2009-2017.state.gov, https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2001/5556.htm#:~:text=There%20are%20no%20financial%20penalties,the%20military%2C%20and%20political%20office. 

13. Disinformation About Religious Minorities in Bangladesh – Sourav Das, https://www.sourav-das.com/assets/research/religion.pdf 

14. Most recent incidents involving minorities not communal: Police Headquarters, https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/most-recent-incidents-involving-minorities-not-communal-police-headquarters-1188681 

15. Police Headquarters: Most recent incidents involving minorities not communal – Dhaka Tribune, https://www.dhakatribune.com/bangladesh/386460/police-reject-communal-angle-in-most 

16. Full article: Civil society and the contemporary threat to religious freedom in Bangladesh, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17448689.2020.1787629

17. Growing preference for religious education | The Financial Express, https://thefinancialexpress.com.bd/views/opinions/growing-preference-for-religious-education 

18. More students opted for religious education, less for general in 2023, https://www.tbsnews.net/bangladesh/education/more-students-opted-religious-education-less-general-2023-815576 

19. Bangladesh: Did Hindus Face a Ban from Government Jobs? Fact Check – The Probe, https://theprobe.in/more/fact-check/bangladesh-did-hindus-face-a-ban-from-government-jobs-fact-check-8596420 

20. Quota system of Bangladesh Civil Service – Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quota_system_of_Bangladesh_Civil_Service 

21. The Socio-economic background of Bangladesh Civil Service …, https://journal.bcsadminacademy.gov.bd/index.php/bjam/article/download/52/52/187#:~:text=Religious%20background&text=In%201990%20the%20officers%20of,Hindu%20religion%20is%20again%20increased. 

22. http://www.state.gov, https://www.state.gov/reports/2023-report-on-international-religious-freedom/bangladesh#:~:text=These%20included%20implementing%20the%20Vested,also%20called%20for%20in%20June%2C 

23. Occupational Inequality in Bangladesh Society: A … – UITS, https://uits.edu.bd/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/9-Occupational-v1i2.pdf 

24. Dynamics and diversity: How are religious minorities faring in the labour Market in Bangladesh? – Munich Personal RePEc Archive, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/75153/1/MPRA_paper_75153.pdf 

25. Inequality in Earnings Among Religious Groups in Bangladesh* – Indian Statistical Institute, https://www.isid.ac.in/~epu/acegd2017/papers/KhawajaAMamun.pdf 

26. A year after uprising, Bangladesh’s youth struggle to find jobs – The Economic Times, https://m.economictimes.com/news/international/world-news/a-year-after-uprising-bangladeshs-youth-struggle-to-find-jobs/articleshow/123040192.cms 

27. 26 Lakh Indians in Bangladesh’s Private Sector! Are We India’s Slave State?, https://dailyasianage.com/news/327037/26-lakh-indians-in-bangladeshs-private-sector-are-we-indias-slave-state